AI-detection tools not relied on

    Does University of the Arts London use AI detection? No

    Genutext Editorial TeamStatement date: Undated; retrieved 23 Aug 2026

    Short answer

    No. University of the Arts London does not run AI detection on submissions, so no AI score is generated for your work.

    Module rules on permitted AI use still apply either way, and a detector score is never the whole case — the university’s own statement and what it means for you are below.

    What University of the Arts London has said

    Detection not used (general). Staff guidance states UAL does not use AI detection software because "These tools currently lack the accuracy required for the UAL to consider them reliable evidence and will lead to 'false positives'".

    Source (Undated; retrieved 23 Aug 2026): AI and Teaching

    The university's page carries no publication date; the statement was last verified against the live page on 23 August 2026.

    Try the text in context

    Run a free AI-writing signal check

    Paste 300 characters to 350 words. The sample is analysed for a first-pass signal and then discarded.

    Free AI check

    0 / 350 words free

    Analysed, then discarded — never stored

    Local-currency pricingNo subscriptionNever storedInstant results

    What this means if you study here

    UAL's staff guidance states it does not use AI detection software because the tools 'currently lack the accuracy required for the UAL to consider them reliable evidence and will lead to false positives'. For a creative-practice university, where unconventional writing styles are the norm, the false-positive concern has particular force.

    UAL submissions carry no AI score. Course-level rules on AI use in creative and written work still apply — and for practice-based work, your iterative process documentation is both good practice and complete protection.

    Turnitin at University of the Arts London

    University of the Arts London says AI-detection tools are not relied on, so a Turnitin AI score should not decide anything about your work here. Similarity checking is a separate feature and remains the sector norm — assume source matching still runs on submissions.

    How the AI writing report behaves wherever it is enabled — the 300-word minimum, the 1–19% asterisk band, and why the score is never proof on its own — is covered in does Turnitin detect AI?

    Before you submit, anywhere

    • Policies change and are re-verified here quarterly — the university’s linked statement above is always the authority, and your module brief overrides everything.
    • Whatever the institutional toggle, keep your drafts and version history: process evidence decides disputes, not scores.
    • No third-party tool predicts a Turnitin result — here is why. Use checks to understand your own writing, not to chase a number.

    Check your own work

    Understand your draft before anyone else reads it

    A free sentence-level preview shows which passages carry AI-like signals — your text is analysed, then discarded. Your first full scan is free with an account.